NEXT STORY

How difficult was it to understand Schwinger?

RELATED STORIES

a story lives forever

Register

Sign in

My Profile

Sign in

Register

NEXT STORY

How difficult was it to understand Schwinger?

RELATED STORIES

The Feynman diagrams

Freeman Dyson
Scientist

Views | Duration | ||
---|---|---|---|

71. Talking physics with Feynman: path integrals | 1 | 3507 | 02:55 |

72. The Feynman diagrams | 1 | 3322 | 02:36 |

73. How difficult was it to understand Schwinger? | 1 | 4549 | 04:55 |

74. George Uhlenbeck and David Park at Ann Arbor | 1601 | 01:18 | |

75. Travels: Berkeley, Martin Luther King, Salt Lake City | 1434 | 01:50 | |

76. Linking the ideas of Feynman, Schwinger and Tomanaga | 2608 | 06:47 | |

77. Meeting Feynman with Cécile DeWitt-Morette - the proof... | 2982 | 02:19 | |

78. Trying to convince Oppenheimer that the old physics works | 2 | 2438 | 03:43 |

79. The seminar series: convincing Oppenheimer | 2258 | 03:54 | |

80. The S-matrix paper that made me famous | 2343 | 02:53 |

- 1
- ...
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- ...
- 16

Comments
(0)
Please sign in or
register to add comments

So Feynman has this path integral picture of the world, as if the world was a kind of a tapestry in which all kinds of things could go on and all you had to do in order to predict the future was start with a known state in the past, allow everything to happen in the intermediate time in all possible ways, every particle or every field could jiggle around as much as it wanted in all directions, and then at the end, in the future state, you want to calculate the probability amplitude for a particular configuration in the future, you simply add up the contributions from all the histories in between. Each history contributes a certain probability amplitude and the amplitude is just the integral of the Lagrangian over the space time volume between the past and future. So that was Feynman's picture and it made sense, it was understandable as a physical picture. But then he had a practical version of this which was a sort of a crude approximation which was the Feynman diagrams, which were very different actually, although they were supposed to be an approximation. The Feynman diagram just consisted of a set of straight line tracks which were supposed to be individual particle tracks, and joined at, vertices where two or three lines would intersect, and each vertex corresponded to an interaction and each straight line corresponded to a particle track. And then you had propagators which were telling you the probability amplitude for the particle to move from A to B, and then instead of a path integral you had just a sum over the propagators. And that was supposed to give you the answer, and the amazing thing was that it did, the amazing thing was that this very simple diagram method gave you the right answers although the connection between that and the path integral wasn't at all obvious. So what I was always trying to persuade Feynman was that it's not enough to get the right answers, you have to understand what you're doing. And so we had big arguments about that, and I told him that he ought to learn some quantum field theory if he wanted really to understand this, and he said it just was a language he never would learn and he didn't think it was worth it. As far as he was concerned he thought in pictures and he didn't think in terms of equations. I thought in terms of equations and not in pictures. So we never agreed, but we just had fun talking.

Freeman Dyson (1923-2020), who was born in England, moved to Cornell University after graduating from Cambridge University with a BA in Mathematics. He subsequently became a professor and worked on nuclear reactors, solid state physics, ferromagnetism, astrophysics and biology. He published several books and, among other honours, was awarded the Heineman Prize and the Royal Society's Hughes Medal.

**Title: **The Feynman diagrams

**Listeners:**
Sam Schweber

Silvan Sam Schweber is the Koret Professor of the History of Ideas and Professor of Physics at Brandeis University, and a Faculty Associate in the Department of the History of Science at Harvard University. He is the author of a history of the development of quantum electro mechanics, "QED and the men who made it", and has recently completed a biography of Hans Bethe and the history of nuclear weapons development, "In the Shadow of the Bomb: Oppenheimer, Bethe, and the Moral Responsibility of the Scientist" (Princeton University Press, 2000).

**Tags:**
Richard Feynman

**Duration:**
2 minutes, 36 seconds

**Date story recorded:**
June 1998

**Date story went live:**
24 January 2008