NEXT STORY
Einstein
RELATED STORIES
NEXT STORY
Einstein
RELATED STORIES
Views | Duration | ||
---|---|---|---|
31. Trying to make a reliable computer out of unreliable parts | 1 | 1479 | 03:16 |
32. Doodling during seminars at the Control Systems Laboratory | 1356 | 03:49 | |
33. Einstein | 1 | 4493 | 04:58 |
34. Oppenheimer | 2893 | 00:54 | |
35. The atmosphere at Princeton. Getting a job in Chicago | 1831 | 03:03 | |
36. Theoretical physics discussion group at Chicago | 1742 | 01:22 | |
37. Fermi | 2929 | 04:16 | |
38. Work at Chicago. Pseudo-scalar meson theory | 1405 | 03:56 | |
39. The atmosphere at Chicago | 1426 | 01:09 | |
40. Discussions with Enrico Fermi; resonance and symmetry | 2193 | 01:55 |
During the lectures at the Control Systems Laboratory during the summer, I doodled and thought about elementary particle theory. And I invented what was later called the Chelean representation [sic], representing the exact propagators for electron and photon in quantum field theory in... as integrals over virtual... over various masses, with weights for the masses. As you know this played an extremely important part later in the renormalization group work, and I noticed already that summer that, for the electron, the weights were both positive and negative, even though it looked as if you could prove they would always be positive. But in a theory with gauge invariants they didn't have to be positive for a charged particle. For a neutral particle they did, so the photon had positive weights and the electron had masses running over positive values and negative values, with the weights being sometimes positive and sometimes negative. I did all that, but I had no idea that that was a new contribution to theoretical physics, so I never told anybody or published it or anything – well, I must have told a few people but I didn't tell a great... I didn't give a seminar on it or... or publish it.
[Q] Did you have anything in mind?
And this was a year before Chelean, so it would have been my representation.
[Q] But were you thinking about quantum electrodynamics per se? I mean...
Field theory in general, including quantum electrodynamics, and I worked out the weights in quantum electrodynamics and saw that they were positive and negative. That was very important because years and years and years later that's how asymptotic freedom came to be recognized because the weights were... when, in Yang-Mills theory, which hadn't yet been invented in 1951, or discovered, whichever you want to call it, in Yang-Mills theory the quanta also have charges and therefore the quanta can have weights that are both positive and negative. And therefore the theorems about the photon that come from the purely positive weights in this representation no longer hold. And that's how you can have the opposite behavior in Yang-Mills theory from what you have in quantum electrodynamics. Anyway, I noted a lot of this and Francis [Low] and I put it into our paper, two, three years later, on what some people called the renormalization group. But actually I discovered it in 1951 while doodling…
[Q] That was also?
…while doodling at seminars at the Control Systems Laboratory.
[Q] The work with Francis was also in Urbana, right, so you must have returned?
It was also in Urbana, two years later, so I spent two summers in Urbana. Very, very, very hot weather in the summer, and only a few rooms were air-conditioned. The Control Systems Laboratory was air-conditioned for the equipment, of course.
[Q] Not for the people.
Right, and so that summer I had air-conditioning, and in ’53 Francis and I were sometimes allowed into air-conditioned rooms so we could think better. But it was only for equipment that people had air-conditioning at that time. Anyway, that was an example of how I actually discovered certain things but didn't realize they were of any importance. So in the fall of ’51 I could have written up this representation and then could have done work based on it and so on and so forth, but it never occurred to me to do that. Instead I kept looking ahead at things that I hadn't done and couldn't do, hoping that I could make progress on some important work.
New York-born physicist Murray Gell-Mann (1929-2019) was known for his creation of the eightfold way, an ordering system for subatomic particles, comparable to the periodic table. His discovery of the omega-minus particle filled a gap in the system, brought the theory wide acceptance and led to Gell-Mann's winning the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1969.
Title: Doodling during seminars at the Control Systems Laboratory
Listeners: Geoffrey West
Geoffrey West is a Staff Member, Fellow, and Program Manager for High Energy Physics at Los Alamos National Laboratory. He is also a member of The Santa Fe Institute. He is a native of England and was educated at Cambridge University (B.A. 1961). He received his Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1966 followed by post-doctoral appointments at Cornell and Harvard Universities. He returned to Stanford as a faculty member in 1970. He left to build and lead the Theoretical High Energy Physics Group at Los Alamos. He has numerous scientific publications including the editing of three books. His primary interest has been in fundamental questions in Physics, especially those concerning the elementary particles and their interactions. His long-term fascination in general scaling phenomena grew out of his work on scaling in quantum chromodynamics and the unification of all forces of nature. In 1996 this evolved into the highly productive collaboration with James Brown and Brian Enquist on the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology and the development of realistic quantitative models that analyse the influence of size on the structural and functional design of organisms.
Tags: Control Systems Laboratory, Urbana, University of Illinois, Francis Low
Duration: 3 minutes, 49 seconds
Date story recorded: October 1997
Date story went live: 24 January 2008