a story lives forever
Sign in
Form submission failed!

Stay signed in

Recover your password?
Form submission failed!

Web of Stories Ltd would like to keep you informed about our products and services.

Please tick here if you would like us to keep you informed about our products and services.

I have read and accepted the Terms & Conditions.

Please note: Your email and any private information provided at registration will not be passed on to other individuals or organisations without your specific approval.

Video URL

You must be registered to use this feature. Sign in or register.


Work on meteors at Jodrell Bank: discovering daytime meteor showers


Do meteors move in parabolic orbits around the sun?
Bernard Lovell Astronomer
Comments (0) Please sign in or register to add comments

Now he was opposed, he was, he was, opposed to a certain extent by, by Porter, an amateur in this country who, I think he, he was working at the Royal Greenwich Observatory and he was convinced that the shower meteors were, were moving at parabolic velocities around the sun, and then I became associated with Fred Whipple, the Smithsonian, and I, I think at that time he was fairly neutral about it. We had one of those early conferences in Manchester, arising from this work at Jodrell Bank and there’s one, one occasion when at Jodrell Bank an enormous argument was taking place between Whipple and Öpik and Whipple turned to me and said, well, if you can measure the velocity of meteors you have a, a, a perfectly clear case of making a decision which has no ambiguity, and so we set about doing that. Now the first successful measurements using the Fresnel zone method was made, not on the shower meteors but on the Geminids meteor shower, one December and with J.G. Davis and Mary Almond, who was one of my first girl research students at Jodrell, we set ourselves a task of studying the, the, the velocity of the stradic meteors. The, the situation was this, that if the, the, the movement of the, the rotation of the earth, movement of the earth in orbit around the sun, if it, if it, you meet a body in space, a interstellar space, then the maximum of loss you can get, is if you were looking at the apex of the earth way in which the, the velocity you would record would be the velocity of the rotation of the earth, plus the velocity of the earth in the solar system, which amounts to 72 kilometres per second. Therefore any meteors, which have velocities of greater than 72 kilometres per second, must be moving in hyperbolic orbits but if there are no meteors of losses of greater, of less, of greater than that, then they must be all combined in parabolic losses around the sun, and similarly, if you directed your observations, your, your aerials or beam of the radar to the ante- antapex of the earth’s way, then you would get the, the min, the maximum velocity would be the difference between the velocities through the solar system and the rotation of the earth. Well, we simply did that. We, we set about a considerable series of measurements in which we directed equipment of various sensitivity, first of all, into the apex of the earth’s way and then into the antapex of the earth’s way, measured velocities of many thousands of sporadic meteors. The results were pretty conclusive. We, we had no evidence whatsoever of any hyperbolic losses or of, of, of any meteors moving at a velocities greater than 72 kilometres per second. We began publishing this work in a series of papers, I think, the monthly notices and then it was pointed out that our greatest criticism made of us was that we were recording only visitors, meteors of considerable magnitude and so we dealt with that by, by using another radar equipment, I think this time, on a wavelength of eight metres in which we had a greater sensitivity. And I think we ended up after several years, in measuring the losses of sporadic meteors of up to magnitudes which we estimated to be plus eight, so we reached a definite conclusion that at least down to that magnitude, all the sporadic meteors must be in parabolic, moving in parabolic velocities around the sun. Well, Öpik, he made several objections but I don’t think they were, they, they were real and I, and I, I, I do not know what happened. I, I presumably if you, if you had enough sensitivity to get down to very faint mangnitudes, then, then there must be dust from interstellar space, but at least all the meteors that had so far been observed and which were visible and just below the, the visible limit, down to a magnitude of plus eight, were confined to the solar system moving in parabolic orbits around the sun.

Bernard Lovell (1913-2012), British radio astronomer and founder of the Jodrell Bank Observatory, received an OBE in 1946 for his work on radar, and was knighted in 1961 for his contribution to the development of radio astronomy. He obtained a PhD in 1936 at the University of Bristol. His steerable radio telescope, which tracked Sputnik across the sky, is now named the Lovell telescope.

Listeners: Megan Argo Alastair Gunn

Megan Argo is an astronomer at the University of Manchester's Jodrell Bank Observatory researching supernovae and star formation in nearby starburst galaxies. As well as research, she is involved with events in the Observatory's Visitor Centre explaining both astronomy and the history of the Observatory to the public.

Alastair Gunn is an astrophysicist at Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester. He is responsible for the coordination and execution of international radio astronomical observations at the institute and his professional research concerns the extended atmospheres of highly active binary stars. Alastair has a deep interest and knowledge of the history of radio astronomy in general and of Jodrell Bank in particular. He has written extensively about Jodrell Bank's history.

Tags: Royal Greenwich Observatory, Jodrell Bank, Geminids, The Sun, Fred Whipple, J G Davis, Mary Almond, Ernst Öpik

Duration: 5 minutes, 44 seconds

Date story recorded: January 2007

Date story went live: 05 September 2008