a story lives forever
Register
Sign in
Form submission failed!

Stay signed in

Recover your password?
Register
Form submission failed!

Web of Stories Ltd would like to keep you informed about our products and services.

Please tick here if you would like us to keep you informed about our products and services.

I have read and accepted the Terms & Conditions.

Please note: Your email and any private information provided at registration will not be passed on to other individuals or organisations without your specific approval.

Video URL

You must be registered to use this feature. Sign in or register.

NEXT STORY

Research and study at Santa Fe. The founding workshops

RELATED STORIES

Founding the Santa Fe Institute (Part 2)
Murray Gell-Mann Scientist
Comments (0) Please sign in or register to add comments

We discussed founding such an institute but there were many questions, of course. What should it be like? What would it study? How would it operate? Some people suggested a relatively narrow focus for it. Nick Metropolis, or Metropolos, I think wanted it to be an institute devoted to computat... parallel computation, and so on. But my point of view, which was supported by some others and eventually, I think, by everybody, was that it ought to be very broad and consider a great number of fields, roughly, in fact, I think the spectrum that it covers now: from mathematics and computer science through physics and chemistry to evolutionary biology, ecology, neurobiology, psychology, immunology, economics, anthropology including archaeology, political science, history, something like that–linguistics, also, that sort of range. And that the computation, while a very important part of the work of the institute would be in great part in the service of science; try to use computation in addition to ordinary analytical theory and to observation as a tool for understanding, and then to use the computers themselves and software on computers also as systems of… to be studied, along with biological systems, social systems and so on. And gradually that idea took hold and I think everybody supported it. But the question was still open as to how the institute would operate and what—in these many fields—what would we do. Well, my feeling and that of some others was that we should make it interdisciplinary in operation, that is people should- it should… it should be a place where people would have the opportunity to co-operate, would be encouraged to co-operate, work together among different fields, something which is largely lacking in our great universities and institutes of technology. And of course, for good reason, because most of the criteria of excellence are within the disciplines. We have systems of degrees and courses and departments and journals and professional societies and sections of granting agencies and so on that are all arranged by field. And we know that mediocre talents like to hide in the crevices among fields. So it's a challenge to figure out how to recognize excellence in interdisciplinary work, but gradually we came to the idea that we would try to recruit people who were really pretty good in what they had done before and were perhaps were still doing to some extent, so we would have experts in all these different subjects working together. That way, if a group of people were working on a problem in linguistics, say, and only one was a linguist, that person would be responsible for making sure that it wasn't phony linguistics, and so on. That principle has held and I think that's more or less the way we… we operate.

New York-born physicist Murray Gell-Mann is known for his creation of the eightfold way, an ordering system for subatomic particles, comparable to the periodic table. His discovery of the omega-minus particle filled a gap in the system, brought the theory wide acceptance and led to Gell-Mann's winning the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1969.

Listeners: Geoffrey West

Geoffrey West is a Staff Member, Fellow, and Program Manager for High Energy Physics at Los Alamos National Laboratory. He is also a member of The Santa Fe Institute. He is a native of England and was educated at Cambridge University (B.A. 1961). He received his Ph.D. from Stanford University in 1966 followed by post-doctoral appointments at Cornell and Harvard Universities. He returned to Stanford as a faculty member in 1970. He left to build and lead the Theoretical High Energy Physics Group at Los Alamos. He has numerous scientific publications including the editing of three books. His primary interest has been in fundamental questions in Physics, especially those concerning the elementary particles and their interactions. His long-term fascination in general scaling phenomena grew out of his work on scaling in quantum chromodynamics and the unification of all forces of nature. In 1996 this evolved into the highly productive collaboration with James Brown and Brian Enquist on the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology and the development of realistic quantitative models that analyse the influence of size on the structural and functional design of organisms.

Tags: Santa Fe Institute, Nick Metropolis

Duration: 3 minutes, 48 seconds

Date story recorded: October 1997

Date story went live: 29 September 2010